This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: When a researcher obtains significant results that are opposite to what was originally hypothesized, ... (Read 118 times)

Tazate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
When a researcher obtains significant results that are opposite to what was originally hypothesized, it is likely that this occurred because of:
 
  A) Inadequate sample size
  B) Unreliable data collection instruments
  C) A flawed statistical analysis
  D) Faulty reasoning

Question 2

When a researcher makes a Type II error (concludes that no relationship between the independent and dependent variable exists when in fact it does), this could occur because of:
 
  A) Inadequate sample size
  B) Unreliable data collection instruments
  C) Problems with adequately implementing the intervention
  D) All of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

frre432

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

D




Tazate

  • Member
  • Posts: 532
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
Gracias!


tranoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Approximately 25% of all reported medication errors result from some kind of name confusion.

Did you know?

The word drug comes from the Dutch word droog (meaning "dry"). For centuries, most drugs came from dried plants, hence the name.

Did you know?

The B-complex vitamins and vitamin C are not stored in the body and must be replaced each day.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library