A narrative integrated review of qualitative studies focuses on ...

[lilldybug07]

A narrative integrated review of qualitative studies focuses on interpretation of the studies. Which of the following study types would be considered an systematic integrated review of qualitative studies?
 
  A) Meta-synthesis
  B) Meta-analysis
  C) Randomized controlled trial
  D) Quasi-experiment

Question 2

The study participant is hesitant to answer a key question in the interview. What statement, made by the interviewer, is appropriate?
 
  1. Why don't you want to answer this question?
  2. You don't have to answer this question if you don't want to.
  3. You are being paid for this information.
  4. It is important to the research that you answer all the questions.

[Dinolord]

Answer to Question 1

A
Feedback:
Systematic reviews can take various forms. One form is a narrative (qualitative) integration that merges and synthesizes findings, much like a rigorous literature review. For integrating evidence from quantitative studies, narrative reviews increasingly are being replaced by a type of systematic review known as a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is a technique for integrating quantitative research findings statistically. For qualitative studies, integration may take the form of a meta-synthesis. A meta-synthesis, however, is distinct from a quantitative meta-analysis: a meta-synthesis is less about reducing information and more about interpreting it. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experiments are not types of systematic reviews.

Answer to Question 2

2
Rationale 1: This is none of the interviewer's business and is an inappropriate remark.
Rationale 2: There should be no pressure put on subjects to answer questions.
Rationale 3: This remark insinuates that the subject has an obligation to answer the question, which is incorrect.
Rationale 4: This answer could create guilt in the subject to get him or her to answer the question.

[lilldybug07]

Gracias!

[lcapri7]

Wow, this really help