Author Question: Which is thought to be an unintended consequence of campaign spending limits introduced in ... (Read 177 times)

BrownTown3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Which is thought to be an unintended consequence of campaign spending limits introduced in California in 2000?
 
  a. an increase in independent expenditures
  b. a significant decrease in campaign spending
  c. increased reliance on grassroots volunteers
  d. fewer women and minority candidates winning elections

Question 2

When something happens to either change public opinion or public policy, thus upsetting the balance between them, it is known as a(n)
 
  a. policy shock.
  b. agenda change.
  c. policy disruption.
  d. political mess.



aloop

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Pregnant women usually experience a heightened sense of smell beginning late in the first trimester. Some experts call this the body's way of protecting a pregnant woman from foods that are unsafe for the fetus.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

Cucumber slices relieve headaches by tightening blood vessels, reducing blood flow to the area, and relieving pressure.

Did you know?

There are immediate benefits of chiropractic adjustments that are visible via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It shows that spinal manipulation therapy is effective in decreasing pain and increasing the gaps between the vertebrae, reducing pressure that leads to pain.

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library