Author Question: In Southern Pacific v. Arizona (1945), the Supreme Court interpreted the absence of federal ... (Read 41 times)

Hungry!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,071
In Southern Pacific v. Arizona (1945), the Supreme Court interpreted the absence of federal legislation regulating the length of trains as
 
  a. authorizing the states to act on this subject.
  b. requiring the states to act on this subject.
  c. an invitation to the states to act on this subject.
  d. None of the above is true.

Question 2

_______________views still dominate the vast majority of broadcast and cable news programs.
 
  Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



leahm14

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

Liberal



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

In 2012, nearly 24 milliion Americans, aged 12 and older, had abused an illicit drug, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

It is difficult to obtain enough calcium without consuming milk or other dairy foods.

Did you know?

In the ancient and medieval periods, dysentery killed about ? of all babies before they reach 12 months of age. The disease was transferred through contaminated drinking water, because there was no way to adequately dispose of sewage, which contaminated the water.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library