Author Question: What is a significant reason two Supreme Courts came to different conclusions in interpreting the ... (Read 42 times)

Coya19@aol.com

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
What is a significant reason two Supreme Courts came to different conclusions in interpreting the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
 
  a. There were new facts in the case.
  b. The two courts were of different generations and had different perspectives on race relations.
   c. They were two completely different cases.
  d. The two courts were trying to please different presidents.

Question 2

Which philosophy is most likely to be supported by a judge who self-identifies as conservative?
 
  a. Support for federal supremacy over the states
   b. Support for states' rights
  c. Support for expanding citizens' rights
  d. Support for increasing the rights of the accused



djpooyouma

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The FDA recognizes 118 routes of administration.

Did you know?

Addicts to opiates often avoid treatment because they are afraid of withdrawal. Though unpleasant, with proper management, withdrawal is rarely fatal and passes relatively quickly.

Did you know?

The most common treatment options for addiction include psychotherapy, support groups, and individual counseling.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library