This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A researcher fails to reject the null hypothesis when there is not a statistically significant ... (Read 59 times)

Wadzanai

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
A researcher fails to reject the null hypothesis when there is not a statistically significant difference between the means of the groups in a study.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Which of these is a coefficient of association between two nominal variables?
 
  a.) gamma
  b.) chi-square
  c.) lambda
  d.) degrees of freedom



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

dudman123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

C




Wadzanai

  • Member
  • Posts: 528
Reply 2 on: Jul 13, 2018
Wow, this really help


kjohnson

  • Member
  • Posts: 330
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

Did you know?

The lipid bilayer is made of phospholipids. They are arranged in a double layer because one of their ends is attracted to water while the other is repelled by water.

Did you know?

On average, the stomach produces 2 L of hydrochloric acid per day.

Did you know?

About 80% of major fungal systemic infections are due to Candida albicans. Another form, Candida peritonitis, occurs most often in postoperative patients. A rare disease, Candida meningitis, may follow leukemia, kidney transplant, other immunosuppressed factors, or when suffering from Candida septicemia.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library