This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The wind chill index A) fails to account for a human body's sensible heat loss and the potential ... (Read 122 times)

V@ndy87

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
The wind chill index
 
  A) fails to account for a human body's sensible heat loss and the potential warming effect of sunlight on the body
  B) accounts for a human body's sensible heat loss and also the potential warming effect of sunlight on the body
  C) accounts for a human body's sensible heat loss but not the potential warming effect of sunlight on the body.
  D) is always less than the temperature, even when there is no wind.

Question 2

The temperature sounding shown in this thermodynamic diagram reveals INSERT FIGURE 3-31. NO CAPTION
 
  A) no temperature inversions
  B) one temperature inversion
  C) more than one temperature inversion



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

mjenn52

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
Answer to Question 1

Answer: C

Answer to Question 2

Answer: C




V@ndy87

  • Member
  • Posts: 571
Reply 2 on: Jul 14, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


xiazhe

  • Member
  • Posts: 331
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Approximately one in three babies in the United States is now delivered by cesarean section. The number of cesarean sections in the United States has risen 46% since 1996.

Did you know?

In 2010, opiate painkllers, such as morphine, OxyContin®, and Vicodin®, were tied to almost 60% of drug overdose deaths.

Did you know?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was originally known as the Communicable Disease Center, which was formed to fight malaria. It was originally headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, since the Southern states faced the worst threat from malaria.

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library