Author Question: Why is it that scientists know less about the first four-fifths of Earth's history than about the ... (Read 139 times)

ap345

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
Why is it that scientists know less about the first four-fifths of Earth's history than about the last, most recent one-fifth?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Assuming that humans went extinct today, do you think that they would be good index fossils? Why or why not?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



dyrone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
Answer to Question 1

Answer: The short answer is that the farther back in time, the fewer the clues that remain because of two major factors: 1) Precambrian rocks (which make up 88 percent of Earth's history) have been intensely deformed, so evidence was destroyed, and 2) the first abundant fossil evidence does not appear until the beginning of the Cambrian period.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: Yes. Modern humans have only existed for 100,000 years and are geographically widespread.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

In most climates, 8 to 10 glasses of water per day is recommended for adults. The best indicator for adequate fluid intake is frequent, clear urination.

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

In 2010, opiate painkllers, such as morphine, OxyContin®, and Vicodin®, were tied to almost 60% of drug overdose deaths.

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library