This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: For a repeated-measures design, the differences between treatments may be caused by a treatment ... (Read 36 times)

burton19126

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
For a repeated-measures design, the differences between treatments may be caused by a treatment effect or by sampling error (random factors), but they cannot be caused by individual differences.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In a distribution with  = 80 and s = 20, a score of X = 95 corresponds to z = 1.50.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

rachel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

True

Answer to Question 2

False




burton19126

  • Member
  • Posts: 532
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Excellent


JCABRERA33

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Since 1988, the CDC has reported a 99% reduction in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, due to the introduction of the vaccine against it.

Did you know?

The National Institutes of Health have supported research into acupuncture. This has shown that acupuncture significantly reduced pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, when used as a complement to conventional therapies.

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

Did you know?

Immunoglobulin injections may give short-term protection against, or reduce severity of certain diseases. They help people who have an inherited problem making their own antibodies, or those who are having certain types of cancer treatments.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library