This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: If we categorize participants' income as below poverty level or above poverty level and then measure ... (Read 108 times)

stock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
If we categorize participants' income as below poverty level or above poverty level and then measure their general level of happiness, income would be considered a(n)
 
  a. continuous variable. c. true independent variable.
  b. dependent variable. d. quasi-independent variable.

Question 2

The dependent variable
 
  a. measures a behavior. c. is manipulated by the researcher.
  b. influences a behavior. d. has two or more conditions or levels.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

cloud

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

A




stock

  • Member
  • Posts: 573
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
:D TYSM


sultana.d

  • Member
  • Posts: 320
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

Did you know?

Russia has the highest death rate from cardiovascular disease followed by the Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library