De Groot argued that master chess players are better than average ...

[mspears3]

De Groot argued that master chess players are better than average players in recalling the location of pieces on a chess board because
 
  a. they have superior memories.
  b. they are better at guessing where the pieces belong.
  c. they can code the pieces better into familiar groups.
  d. they rely more on verbal rehearsal than average players.

Question 2

The difference between master chess players and novice chess players viewing a chess board briefly is
 
  a. a difference in the ability to memorize legal but not illegal chess positions.
  b. a difference in the ability to memorize legal and illegal chess positions.
  c. no difference in the ability to memorize chess positions.
  d. None of these

[sailorcrescent]

Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

A

[mspears3]

Great answer, keep it coming

[epscape]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it