Author Question: If within-groups variance is large, then we have observed: a. experimenter effects. b. an effect ... (Read 99 times)

rosent76

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
If within-groups variance is large, then we have observed:
 
  a. experimenter effects.
  b. an effect of the dependent variable.
  c. a large amount of error variance.
  d. an effect of the independent variable.

Question 2

If between-groups variance is small, then we have NOT observed:
 
  a. experimenter effects.
  b. an effect of the dependent variable.
  c. enough samples.
  d. an effect of the independent variable.



carojassy25

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

For about 100 years, scientists thought that peptic ulcers were caused by stress, spicy food, and alcohol. Later, researchers added stomach acid to the list of causes and began treating ulcers with antacids. Now it is known that peptic ulcers are predominantly caused by Helicobacter pylori, a spiral-shaped bacterium that normally exist in the stomach.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library