This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Cost-effectiveness analysis compares two or more treatments or programs that are: 1. Not ... (Read 71 times)

maegan_martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Cost-effectiveness analysis compares two or more treatments or programs that are:
 
  1. Not necessarily therapeutically equivalent
  2. Considered equal in efficacy
  3. Compared with the dollar value of the benefit received
  4. Expressed in terms of patient preference or quality-adjusted life years

Question 2

When the costs of a specific treatment or intervention are calculated and then compared with the dollar value of the benefit received it is referred to as:
 
  1. Cost-minimization analysis
  2. Cost-of-illness analysis
  3. Cost-effectiveness analysis
  4. Cost-benefit analysis



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kthug

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

1

Answer to Question 2

4




maegan_martin

  • Member
  • Posts: 532
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


ecabral0

  • Member
  • Posts: 310
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Multiple sclerosis is a condition wherein the body's nervous system is weakened by an autoimmune reaction that attacks the myelin sheaths of neurons.

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

The people with the highest levels of LDL are Mexican American males and non-Hispanic black females.

Did you know?

The calories found in one piece of cherry cheesecake could light a 60-watt light bulb for 1.5 hours.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library