This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A study of changing speed limits in the United States finds no evidence that higher limits fuel more ... (Read 42 times)

panfilo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
A study of changing speed limits in the United States finds no evidence that higher limits fuel more deaths. A scientist examined shifts in speed limit laws over the past few decades. Highway speed limits were initially throttled in the 1970s in response to the gas shortage. In the 1980s the focus shifted to public safety. Yet in 1995, Congress returned all speed limit authority back to the states, and many states raised their top highway speeds. While limits ranged from 75 mph to 55 and back again, no significant increase in fatalities per mile driven are evident. In fact, from 1968 to 1991, the fatality rate per 100 million miles declined by 63.2 percent. The scientist attributes the decrease to safer cars, increased use of seat belts, an increase in the minimum legal drinking age, and better road maintenance. Automobile safety features and enforcement emerge as important factors in increasing highway safety, the scientist contends. Speed limits are far less important. In the study safer cars, increased use of seat belts, an increase in the minimum legal drinking age, and better road maintenance are mentioned as reasons for a decline in the fatality rate between 1968 and 1991 . What do we call these 4 variables?
 a. Response variables
  b. Qualitative variables
  c. Confounding variables
  d. Interacting variables

Question 2

A study of changing speed limits in the United States finds no evidence that higher limits fuel more deaths. A scientist examined shifts in speed limit laws over the past few decades. Highway speed limits were initially throttled in the 1970s in response to the gas shortage. In the 1980s the focus shifted to public safety. Yet in 1995, Congress returned all speed limit authority back to the states, and many states raised their top highway speeds. While limits ranged from 75 mph to 55 and back again, no significant increase in fatalities per mile driven are evident. In fact, from 1968 to 1991, the fatality rate per 100 million miles declined by 63.2 percent. The scientist attributes the decrease to safer cars, increased use of seat belts, an increase in the minimum legal drinking age, and better road maintenance. Automobile safety features and enforcement emerge as important factors in increasing highway safety, the scientist contends. Speed limits are far less important. What type of study is described above?
 a. Prospective observational, because we already know that the speed limits were changed at the beginning of the study. We have to wait and see if the fatality rate has changed.
  b. Retrospective observational, because records were studied going all the way back to the 1970's.
  c. An experiment, people have to actively drive their cars at these different speed limits.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

chevyboi1976

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

B




panfilo

  • Member
  • Posts: 572
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


Dominic

  • Member
  • Posts: 328
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Green tea is able to stop the scent of garlic or onion from causing bad breath.

Did you know?

Many people have small pouches in their colons that bulge outward through weak spots. Each pouch is called a diverticulum. About 10% of Americans older than age 40 years have diverticulosis, which, when the pouches become infected or inflamed, is called diverticulitis. The main cause of diverticular disease is a low-fiber diet.

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

Bisphosphonates were first developed in the nineteenth century. They were first investigated for use in disorders of bone metabolism in the 1960s. They are now used clinically for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone metastasis, multiple myeloma, and other conditions that feature bone fragility.

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library