This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Explain how the results of a very small study can be misleading. (Assume data quality is not an ... (Read 19 times)

kwoodring

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
Explain how the results of a very small study can be misleading. (Assume data quality is not an issue.)

Question 2

Is there such a thing as a sample size that was too large, in terms of producing misleading conclusions about the population? __________ (choose: yes, no)
 Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

amcvicar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

IF THE SAMPLE SIZE IS TOO SMALL, AN IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIP OR DIFFERENCE CAN GO UNDETECTED.

Answer to Question 2

YES




kwoodring

  • Member
  • Posts: 560
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Wow, this really help


TheNamesImani

  • Member
  • Posts: 334
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Pope Sylvester II tried to introduce Arabic numbers into Europe between the years 999 and 1003, but their use did not catch on for a few more centuries, and Roman numerals continued to be the primary number system.

Did you know?

Studies show that systolic blood pressure can be significantly lowered by taking statins. In fact, the higher the patient's baseline blood pressure, the greater the effect of statins on his or her blood pressure.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

All adults should have their cholesterol levels checked once every 5 years. During 2009–2010, 69.4% of Americans age 20 and older reported having their cholesterol checked within the last five years.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library