This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In testing the randomness of data using the Runs test, when do we reject the null ... (Read 46 times)

kaid0807

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
In testing the randomness of data using the Runs test, when do we reject the null hypothesis?

Question 2

The mean of any normal distribution is always zero.
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

bulacsom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

We will reject the hypothesis when there are too few runs because this indicated that the data are separated according to the two properties (e.g., above or below the median value.) We will also reject the null hypothesis when there are too many runs because that indicates that the data alternate between the two properties too often to be random.

Answer to Question 2

F




kaid0807

  • Member
  • Posts: 515
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Gracias!


ttt030911

  • Member
  • Posts: 315
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

As many as 28% of hospitalized patients requiring mechanical ventilators to help them breathe (for more than 48 hours) will develop ventilator-associated pneumonia. Current therapy involves intravenous antibiotics, but new antibiotics that can be inhaled (and more directly treat the infection) are being developed.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library