Which of the following best explains why we can rule out the idea that planets are usually formed by near-collisions between stars?
A) Studies of the trajectories of nearby stars relative to the Sun show that the Sun is not in danger of a near-collision with any of them.
B) Stellar near-collisions are far too rare to explain all the planets now known to orbit nearby stars.
C) A near collision might have created planets, but it could not have created moons, asteroids, or comets.
D) A near collision should have left a trail of gas extending out behind the Sun, and we see no evidence of such a trail.
Question 2
Which of the following are irregularities in our solar system that must be explainable in models of planetary formation?
A) Venus' low rate of rotation
B) Mars' north-south asymmetry
C) the tilt of Uranus' rotation axis
D) binary Kuiper Belt objects
E) All of the above
Independent assortment of chromosomes at meiosis explains Mendel’s ratio
A blood smear. The smear reveals representative cells from each formed element group: red blood cell
In the summer of 1963, Buddhist monks protested against the rule of Diem (and his brother, the ...
Wheals are formed in reaction to scratch testing and intradermal testing of allergens.
How to perform the substitution rule with integrals (Part 1)
Find derivative using product rule