This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What reason did Hubbert have to think that the normal curve would describe the production of oil? ... (Read 17 times)

natalie2426

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
What reason did Hubbert have to think that the normal curve would describe the production of oil? Would the Hubbert description apply to a natural resource such as coal in addition to oil? Why or why not?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Historians claim that mechanization (development of the cotton gin) was responsible for preservation of the institution of slavery in the American South.
 
  Discuss the possibility that they could be correct or incorrect, and try to find evidence to support your thesis.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Liamb2179

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Answer to Question 1

Oil is a finite resource. At the beginning of exploitation, the production grows
exponentially as new uses are found, partly because the resource is cheaper than
alternatives. At the end of exploitation, the resource is progressively harder to obtain, it
becomes more expensive, etc. In between, exploitation (production) must hit a maximum.
This sounds very much like a terse description of a normal curve.
Further, the rate of discovery translates into production at a later time. Hubbert observed that
the delay time between discovery and production in the United States was 11 years. If
discovery drops this year, production will have to drop 11 years hence. That was the method
he used to make his famous prediction of peak U.S. production in 1970 (from the lower 48
states).
Any resource that is finite can be modeled in a similar way. All that is needed is for rapid
growth in the beginning and rapid drop at the end, and this is mandated by human behavior
in response to discovery of resources.

Answer to Question 2

The historians are on to something important. The machine saved much human
labor, but allowed the crops to become much bigger (because the bottleneck of picking the
seeds out by hand was eliminated). More cotton meant more profit. More profit meant still
more cotton was planted. The glut of cotton led to further mechanization of the making of
cloth in the industrialized world, but in the American south the increase led to an explosion
of work, leading to importation of more slaves to do that work in the forbidding climate.




natalie2426

  • Member
  • Posts: 524
Reply 2 on: Jul 28, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


aruss1303

  • Member
  • Posts: 314
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

After 5 years of being diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, one every three patients will no longer be able to work.

Did you know?

People often find it difficult to accept the idea that bacteria can be beneficial and improve health. Lactic acid bacteria are good, and when eaten, these bacteria improve health and increase longevity. These bacteria included in foods such as yogurt.

Did you know?

Street names for barbiturates include reds, red devils, yellow jackets, blue heavens, Christmas trees, and rainbows. They are commonly referred to as downers.

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library