Author Question: Explain why aluminum cans won out in the beverage wars even though steel cans cost less energy per ... (Read 42 times)

Chelseaamend

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
Explain why aluminum cans won out in the beverage wars even though steel cans cost less energy per use to make.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

It is energetically feasible to use more logging residue for energy. There is a large amount available. What reasons, if any, are there against using this resource? Explain.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



billybob123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

This probably occurred because of the cost of transportation, which was greater
for steel cans, and because steel cans changed the taste of beer (and presumably other
drinks, though it was less obvious). The beer bottlers adopted aluminum cans and because
of economies of scale, other bottlers did as well.

Answer to Question 2

The residue, if left in place, can contribute to soil fertility. Retention of organic
matter enhances subsequent productivity. Removal of all ground cover, characteristic of
clearcutting, can have adverse effects on the soil and hinder reestablishment of the local
ecosystem.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Green tea is able to stop the scent of garlic or onion from causing bad breath.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

Street names for barbiturates include reds, red devils, yellow jackets, blue heavens, Christmas trees, and rainbows. They are commonly referred to as downers.

Did you know?

Approximately 500,000 babies are born each year in the United States to teenage mothers.

Did you know?

Many of the drugs used by neuroscientists are derived from toxic plants and venomous animals (such as snakes, spiders, snails, and puffer fish).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library