This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In their experiment on primary memory, Waugh and Norman presented a series of digits that ended with ... (Read 25 times)

DyllonKazuo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 565
In their experiment on primary memory, Waugh and Norman presented a series of digits that ended with a probe digit. From the results obtained by varying the number of digits presented in a given time they concluded that:
 
  A) interference is not a factor in STM
  B) STM is subject to decay more than interference
  C) interference does not affect recall of digits
  D) STM is subject to interference effects more than decay
  E) LTM is largely immune to interference and decay

Question 2

Posner's research with delayed matching of letters indicates that STM code was:
 
  A) auditory
  B) visual
  C) semantic
  D) visual and auditory
  E) visual, auditory, and semantic



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

leahm14

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

D




DyllonKazuo

  • Member
  • Posts: 565
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Gracias!


Missbam101

  • Member
  • Posts: 341
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Women are two-thirds more likely than men to develop irritable bowel syndrome. This may be attributable to hormonal changes related to their menstrual cycles.

Did you know?

The top five reasons that children stay home from school are as follows: colds, stomach flu (gastroenteritis), ear infection (otitis media), pink eye (conjunctivitis), and sore throat.

Did you know?

More than 34,000 trademarked medication names and more than 10,000 generic medication names are in use in the United States.

Did you know?

All adults should have their cholesterol levels checked once every 5 years. During 2009–2010, 69.4% of Americans age 20 and older reported having their cholesterol checked within the last five years.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library