Author Question: Consider the motion of a 1.00-kg particle that moves with potential energy given by U(x) = -(2.0 ... (Read 60 times)

mwit1967

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
Consider the motion of a 1.00-kg particle that moves with potential energy given by U(x) = -(2.0 Jm)/x + (4.0 Jm2)/x2. Suppose the particle is moving with a speed of 3.00 m/s when it is located at x = 1.00 m.
 
  What is the speed of the object when it is located at x = 5.00 m? A)
 
  2.13 m/s
  B)
 
  3.00 m/s
  C)
 
  4.68 m/s
  D)
 
  3.67 m/s
  E)
 
  This question cannot be answered. You need to know the direction of the velocity, not just the speed, when the particle is located at x = 1.00 m.

Question 2

If the principal quantum number of an electron is n = 5, which one of the following is NOT an allowed magnetic quantum number ml for the electron?
 
  A) 2 B) 4 C) 0 D) 3 E) 5



lorealeza77

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

E



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The familiar sounds of your heart are made by the heart's valves as they open and close.

Did you know?

There can actually be a 25-hour time difference between certain locations in the world. The International Date Line passes between the islands of Samoa and American Samoa. It is not a straight line, but "zig-zags" around various island chains. Therefore, Samoa and nearby islands have one date, while American Samoa and nearby islands are one day behind. Daylight saving time is used in some islands, but not in others—further shifting the hours out of sync with natural time.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

The most destructive flu epidemic of all times in recorded history occurred in 1918, with approximately 20 million deaths worldwide.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library