This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Your friend says that any radio wave travels appreciably faster than any sound wave. A) agree ... (Read 73 times)

jessicacav

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
Your friend says that any radio wave travels appreciably faster than any sound wave.
 
  A) agree with your friend unconditionally
  B) agree with your friend for most common cases
  C) disagree with your friend
  D) find a new friend

Question 2

Radio waves travel
 
  A) always much faster than sound waves.
  B) in common cases at the same speed as sound waves.
  C) slower, on average, than sound waves.
  D) at a speed that depends on frequency.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

234sdffa

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

Answer: A

Answer to Question 2

Answer: A




jessicacav

  • Member
  • Posts: 558
Reply 2 on: Jul 29, 2018
:D TYSM


rachel

  • Member
  • Posts: 323
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Interferon was scarce and expensive until 1980, when the interferon gene was inserted into bacteria using recombinant DNA technology, allowing for mass cultivation and purification from bacterial cultures.

Did you know?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all women age 65 years of age or older should be screened with bone densitometry.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates’s recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library