Because we tend to identify with the individuals we are rating, we sometimes rate them higher than we actually believe them to be. This concept is called:
a. generosity error.
b. interrater reliability.
c. criterion referenced rating.
d. the halo effect.
Question 2
Generosity error is:
a. when the individual doing the rating identifies with the person being rated and thus rates the individual inaccurately.
b. when the overall impression of an individual clouds the rating of that person in one select area.
c. when observational methods and ratings scales will likely not be an effective tool to use due to the vague nature of the attribute being observed.
d. when an individual is being too nice in his or her ratings of another.
Tree species richness in North America is correlated with evapotranspiration rate.
Male individuals of the banded Uromastyx, Uromastyx flavofasciata, are different colours. Most natur
Linked alleles tend to be inherited together
Primates in the New World tend to be small-bodied compared to those elsewhere.
Correlations on tests for a number of cognitive abilities are higher for monozygotic twin pairs (who ...
Adults in the middle-aged group (37–42 years) score higher on measures of generativity than either ...