This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: It is not necessary to double-check and verify cases or other legal citations found in encyclopedias ... (Read 48 times)

lak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
It is not necessary to double-check and verify cases or other legal citations found in encyclopedias before relying on them, because they are always current.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Encyclopedias are not primary legal materials but are appropriately utilized as secondary and even tertiary source leads.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

orangecrush

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Answer to Question 1

F

Answer to Question 2

T




lak

  • Member
  • Posts: 546
Reply 2 on: Aug 2, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


xiaomengxian

  • Member
  • Posts: 311
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

The average older adult in the United States takes five prescription drugs per day. Half of these drugs contain a sedative. Alcohol should therefore be avoided by most senior citizens because of the dangerous interactions between alcohol and sedatives.

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

Critical care patients are twice as likely to receive the wrong medication. Of these errors, 20% are life-threatening, and 42% require additional life-sustaining treatments.

Did you know?

The strongest synthetic topical retinoid drug available, tazarotene, is used to treat sun-damaged skin, acne, and psoriasis.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library