The reason why a plaintiff might be able to recover under a claim ...

[Mr.Thesaxman]

The reason why a plaintiff might be able to recover under a claim of strict liability is
 
  A) breach of warranty of fitness for a particular use
  B) intentional infliction of emotional distress
  C) the product was unreasonably dangerous
  D) the seller breached a duty of care

Question 2

A customer who gets splashed with coffee that is so hot that it can burn off flesh in seconds can
  most effectively sue for
 
  A) breach of warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
  B) breach of warranty of merchantability
  C) intentional infliction of emotional defense
  D) strict liability

[Ddddd]

Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

D

[Mr.Thesaxman]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[ultraflyy23]

Gracias!