A real property owner whose proposed use does not strictly comply ...

[RRMR]

A real property owner whose proposed use does not strictly comply with an area's current zoning classification, but which is not necessarily incompatible with that classification either, may be issued which of the following by the local zoning board:
 
  a. Non-conforming use
  b. Variance
  c. Conditional use permit
  d. All of the above

Question 2

The admissibility of statements of a party-opponent is an exception to the hearsay rule.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

[helenmarkerine]

Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

False (it's simply excluded from the definition).

[RRMR]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[amcvicar]

Wow, this really help