This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: It is not surprising that in 2012, nearly ________ percent of female-headed families lived in ... (Read 60 times)

DelorasTo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
It is not surprising that in 2012, nearly ________ percent of female-headed families lived in
  poverty, over six times the poverty rate of a family headed by a married couple.
 
  A) 21
  B) 31
  C) 41
  D) 51

Question 2

The ________ stipulates that pay discrimination claims accrue with every discriminatory
  paycheck an employee receives, not only when a discriminatory pay decision or practice is
  adopted.
 
  A) Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act
  B) Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
  C) Social Security Act
  D) Fair Pay and Equal Pay Acts



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Dominic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

B




DelorasTo

  • Member
  • Posts: 548
Reply 2 on: Aug 4, 2018
:D TYSM


Dinolord

  • Member
  • Posts: 313
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

About one in five American adults and teenagers have had a genital herpes infection—and most of them don't know it. People with genital herpes have at least twice the risk of becoming infected with HIV if exposed to it than those people who do not have genital herpes.

Did you know?

If you use artificial sweeteners, such as cyclamates, your eyes may be more sensitive to light. Other factors that will make your eyes more sensitive to light include use of antibiotics, oral contraceptives, hypertension medications, diuretics, and antidiabetic medications.

Did you know?

Not getting enough sleep can greatly weaken the immune system. Lack of sleep makes you more likely to catch a cold, or more difficult to fight off an infection.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library