This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: How does sprawl hurt cities? a. It erodes the city's tax base. b. It destroys downtown ... (Read 98 times)

faduma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
How does sprawl hurt cities?
 
  a. It erodes the city's tax base.
   b. It destroys downtown commerce.
   c. It increases unemployment and concentrates poverty in urban centers.
  d. All of the above

Question 2

Oregon and Washington require all communities to make official designations in order to separate urban areas from the surrounding greenbelt of open lands, including farms, watersheds, and parks. These designations are called
 
  a. urban growth boundaries.
  b. revitalized zones.
  c. transit-oriented zones.
  d. edge cities.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

peilian

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

a



faduma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again



peilian

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316

 

Did you know?

Asthma attacks and symptoms usually get started by specific triggers (such as viruses, allergies, gases, and air particles). You should talk to your doctor about these triggers and find ways to avoid or get rid of them.

Did you know?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA was discovered in 1961 in the United Kingdom. It if often referred to as a superbug. MRSA infections cause more deaths in the United States every year than AIDS.

Methicilli ...
Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

Did you know?

The eye muscles are the most active muscles in the whole body. The external muscles that move the eyes are the strongest muscles in the human body for the job they have to do. They are 100 times more powerful than they need to be.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library