Author Question: A study by psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark was cited in the arguments before the U.S. Supreme ... (Read 120 times)

shofmannx20 · **on:** Aug 8, 2018

A study by psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark was cited in the arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education. The finding of Clarks' study suggested that ________.

a. Black children preferred Black dolls
b. Black children had developed a negative self-image
c. White social scientists tend to be biased
d. White-faced dolls were more readily available to children

Question 2

Describe the immigration patterns of Central and South Americans to the United States.

What will be an ideal response?

stano32 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 8, 2018

Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

Immigration from the various Central and South American nations has been sporadic, influenced by our immigration laws and social forces operating in the home countries. Perceived economic opportunities escalated the northward movement in the 1960s. By 1970, Panamanians and Hondurans represented the largest national groupings, most of them being identified in the census as nonwhite. By 2010, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Columbia were the top countries of origin, each with at least a million present. Immigration often comes through Mexico, which may serve as a brief stop along the way or represent a point of settlement for six months to three years or even longer. Since the mid-1970s, increasing numbers of Central and South Americans have fled unrest. Although Latinos as a whole are a fast-growing minority, the numbers of Central and South Americans increased even faster than the numbers of Mexicans or any other group in the 1980s. In particular, from about 1978, war and economic chaos in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Guatemala prompted many to seek refuge in the United States.
The impact of the turmoil cannot be exaggerated. Regarding the total populations of each country, it is estimated that anywhere from 13 percent in Guatemala to 32 percent in El Salvador left their respective countries. Not at all a homogeneous group, they range from Guatemalan Indian peasants to wealthy Nicaraguan exiles. These latest arrivals probably had some economic motivation for migration, but this concern was overshadowed or at least matched by their fear of being killed or hurt if they remained in their home country.