Author Question: According to SCOTUS in Chimel v. California, involving the search of a house incident to an arrest ... (Read 89 times)

stevenposner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 608
According to SCOTUS in Chimel v. California, involving the search of a house incident to an arrest for burglary of a coin shop:
 
  a. it is not reasonable to search a person who is lawfully arrested.
 b. it is not reasonable to search an entire house incident to a lawful arrest.
  c. the Fourth Amendment does not protect searches incident to lawful arrests.
  d. police must always have search warrants to search persons.

Question 2

Consent that takes place when one person in fact has the legal authority to consent to a search of the home and possessions of another person is called:
 
  a. apparent authority consent.
  b. official consent.
 c. prospective consent.
 d. actual authority consent.



kbennett34

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

Immunoglobulin injections may give short-term protection against, or reduce severity of certain diseases. They help people who have an inherited problem making their own antibodies, or those who are having certain types of cancer treatments.

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

As the western states of America were settled, pioneers often had to drink rancid water from ponds and other sources. This often resulted in chronic diarrhea, causing many cases of dehydration and death that could have been avoided if clean water had been available.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library