Author Question: There is no search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if police use drug-detection dogs, as ... (Read 35 times)

asd123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
There is no search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if police use drug-detection dogs, as long as the police:
 
  a. have a warrant.
  b. have a reasonable suspicion.
  c. have properly trained the dog.
  d. are legally at the location.

Question 2

Searches and seizures by private citizens acting solely on their own:
 
  a. require at least a reasonable suspicion.
  b. require at least probable cause.
  c. are covered by the Fifth Amendment.
  d. are not covered by the Fourth Amendment.



sultana.d

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

As many as 20% of Americans have been infected by the fungus known as Histoplasmosis. While most people are asymptomatic or only have slight symptoms, infection can progress to a rapid and potentially fatal superinfection.

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Bisphosphonates were first developed in the nineteenth century. They were first investigated for use in disorders of bone metabolism in the 1960s. They are now used clinically for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone metastasis, multiple myeloma, and other conditions that feature bone fragility.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library