For this evidence to be admissible and not a violation of the ...

[michelleunicorn]

For this evidence to be admissible and not a violation of the exclusionary rule,
 
  a. no search warrant is needed, because of the principle of inevitable discovery.
  b. no search warrant is needed, because it is independent source.
  c. a search warrant would have been needed.
  d. no search warrant is needed, because the actions occurring in the apartment were illegal.

Question 2

What would be the result today in state court?
 
  a. All the evidence would be admissible
  b. Only the printing presses would be admissible
  c. None of the evidence would be admissible
  d. Only the printing plates would be admissible

[reelove4eva]

Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

d

[michelleunicorn]

Gracias!

[parker125]

Excellent