This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why does the Supreme Court require beyond a reasonable doubt as the standard of proof in criminal ... (Read 60 times)

Marty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Why does the Supreme Court require beyond a reasonable doubt as the standard of proof in criminal cases, rather than preponderance of the evidence as in civil cases?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Why would a witness in a trial be granted immunity?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Awesome

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Answer to Question 1

there is a risk of sending innocent people to prison
a life is at risk

Answer to Question 2

A witness in a trial would be granted immunity when they have testimony against other criminals, but would incriminate themselves.




Marty

  • Member
  • Posts: 553
Reply 2 on: Aug 17, 2018
Gracias!


Jsherida

  • Member
  • Posts: 314
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

The word drug comes from the Dutch word droog (meaning "dry"). For centuries, most drugs came from dried plants, hence the name.

Did you know?

Eating carrots will improve your eyesight. Carrots are high in vitamin A (retinol), which is essential for good vision. It can also be found in milk, cheese, egg yolks, and liver.

Did you know?

People with high total cholesterol have about two times the risk for heart disease as people with ideal levels.

Did you know?

Eating food that has been cooked with poppy seeds may cause you to fail a drug screening test, because the seeds contain enough opiate alkaloids to register as a positive.

Did you know?

The strongest synthetic topical retinoid drug available, tazarotene, is used to treat sun-damaged skin, acne, and psoriasis.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library