Answer to Question 1
a
Answer to Question 2
Court ruled that compulsory self-identification to law enforcement personnel was not unconstitutional and was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures nor was it a violation of the Fifth Amendment's protection from self-incrimination. In a nutshell, the Court ruled that compulsory disclosure of identification did not violate the Fourth Amendment because (1) it served an important government interest; (2) it was immediately relevant to the original purpose of a Terry stop; (3) the threat of criminal sanction was necessary for compliance; and (4) such a request would not alter the nature of the stop itself. In addition, the Court ruled that such compulsion did not violate the Fifth Amendment because the disclosure of identity, in and of itself, did not reasonably pose a danger of the self-incrimination forbidden by the statute. Thus, the Court ruled that in temporary investigative detentions, state statutes that require self-identification by private citizens are constitutional.
The life cycle of a zygomycete, the black bread mould Rhizopus stolonifer.
palaeous life
Empathy draws a more positive response from the patient because it is based on the willingness of th
Jan de Heem, Still Life with Lobster.
Enterohepatic recirculation of a drug can increase its half-life in the body and prolong its ...
Marine Life Zones "الحياة في أعماق البحار"