This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The Supreme Court caseCoolidge v. New Hampshiredeclaredthat inadvertency is not a requirement for a ... (Read 64 times)

craiczarry

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
The Supreme Court caseCoolidge v. New Hampshiredeclaredth at inadvertency is not a requirement for a valid plain view seizure.
 
  a. True
  b. False

Question 2

Which of the following is not a division of the Bureau of Consumer Protection within the FTC?
 
  a. Advertising practices
  b. Enforcement
  c. Fraud
  d. Financial practices



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

hugthug12

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

c




craiczarry

  • Member
  • Posts: 527
Reply 2 on: Aug 25, 2018
Gracias!


kswal303

  • Member
  • Posts: 316
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

The ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen in water (H2O) is 2:1.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

Urine turns bright yellow if larger than normal amounts of certain substances are consumed; one of these substances is asparagus.

Did you know?

Pope Sylvester II tried to introduce Arabic numbers into Europe between the years 999 and 1003, but their use did not catch on for a few more centuries, and Roman numerals continued to be the primary number system.

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library