This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following is NOT a reason a bright-line decision may be helpful? a. It promotes ... (Read 76 times)

tsand2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
Which of the following is NOT a reason a bright-line decision may be helpful?
 
  a. It promotes consistency.
  b. It promotes clarity and predictability.
  c. It is ambiguous.
  d. It is subject to very little interpretation.

Question 2

In order for a case to reach the Supreme Court, the court must decide whether it wants to hear the case. If the Supreme Court agrees that case is worth deciding, it issues what is known as a:
 
  a. lex loci.
  b. jus cogens.
  c. certiorari.
  d. writ of certiorari.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

tdewitt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

d




tsand2

  • Member
  • Posts: 520
Reply 2 on: Aug 25, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


komodo7

  • Member
  • Posts: 322
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Illness; diuretics; laxative abuse; hot weather; exercise; sweating; caffeine; alcoholic beverages; starvation diets; inadequate carbohydrate consumption; and diets high in protein, salt, or fiber can cause people to become dehydrated.

Did you know?

A strange skin disease referred to as Morgellons has occurred in the southern United States and in California. Symptoms include slowly healing sores, joint pain, persistent fatigue, and a sensation of things crawling through the skin. Another symptom is strange-looking, threadlike extrusions coming out of the skin.

Did you know?

Cucumber slices relieve headaches by tightening blood vessels, reducing blood flow to the area, and relieving pressure.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library