Author Question: The absence of any authority capable of regulating the conduct of nation-states is referred to as ... (Read 25 times)

Cooldude101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
The absence of any authority capable of regulating the conduct of nation-states is referred to as anarchy.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Contemporary events both support and refute Huntington's thesis in that
 
  a. liberal democracy is popular but not necessarily accepted in all regions of the world.
  b. there is a social-psychological distance between cultures but it may not lead to fault line wars.
  c. fragmentation is occurring but not as a result of globalization.
  d. some states support a world government but others embrace state sovereignty.



underwood14

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Answer to Question 1

T

Answer to Question 2

B



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Certain topical medications such as clotrimazole and betamethasone are not approved for use in children younger than 12 years of age. They must be used very cautiously, as directed by a doctor, to treat any child. Children have a much greater response to topical steroid medications.

Did you know?

People with alcoholism are at a much greater risk of malnutrition than are other people and usually exhibit low levels of most vitamins (especially folic acid). This is because alcohol often takes the place of 50% of their daily intake of calories, with little nutritional value contained in it.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

Less than one of every three adults with high LDL cholesterol has the condition under control. Only 48.1% with the condition are being treated for it.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library