This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Evidence-based treatment literature has been criticized for: a) Making it impossible for ... (Read 53 times)

evelyn o bentley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Evidence-based treatment literature has been criticized for:
 
  a) Making it impossible for clinicians to compare treatment efficacy.
  b) Excluding participants that have comorbidity conditions.
  c) Presenting results in a way that the general population cannot use.
  d) Being too vague.

Question 2

Janet wants to be able study phenomena and draw broad conclusions; which design is least likely to help her achieve her goal?
 
  a) The case study method.
  b) The correlational method.
  c) The experimental method.
  d) The mixed design method.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

trampas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

a




evelyn o bentley

  • Member
  • Posts: 564
Reply 2 on: Jun 22, 2018
Wow, this really help


Laurenleakan

  • Member
  • Posts: 309
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Adults are resistant to the bacterium that causes Botulism. These bacteria thrive in honey – therefore, honey should never be given to infants since their immune systems are not yet resistant.

Did you know?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic. Eight ounces of water is needed to metabolize just 1 ounce of alcohol.

Did you know?

Studies show that systolic blood pressure can be significantly lowered by taking statins. In fact, the higher the patient's baseline blood pressure, the greater the effect of statins on his or her blood pressure.

Did you know?

Sperm cells are so tiny that 400 to 500 million (400,000,000–500,000,000) of them fit onto 1 tsp.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library