Author Question: A woman sought to set aside a mortgage on the grounds of misrepresentation, undue influence, and non ... (Read 54 times)

lunatika · **on:** Aug 7, 2021

A woman sought to set aside a mortgage on the grounds of misrepresentation, undue influence, and non est factum. She had been persuaded to enter into that mortgage contract with a mortgage company by her doctor. Which of the following is true with regard to these challenges to the mortgage contract?
◦ If she failed to read the mortgage agreement, the mortgage would be void on the basis of non est factum.
◦ If she were influenced to sign the mortgage by her doctor and the court found undue influence, the mortgage would be void and she wouldn't have to pay the mortgage company.
◦ If the court found that there was undue influence by her doctor, who obtained the money from the mortgage, she would not have to repay the mortgage company.
◦ If she were influenced to sign the mortgage by her doctor and the mortgage benefited the doctor, the court would presume undue influence.
◦ If the person who misled her as to the contents of the mortgage agreement honestly thought what he was stating was correct, she could sue for only damages, not rescission.

Beatricemm · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 7, 2021

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 25% of students answer this correctly