Author Question: The private right to sue for private nuisance was reinforced with the Supreme Court of Canada ... (Read 37 times)

Melani1276 · **on:** Aug 7, 2021

Question 1

People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?
◦ real property rights
◦ environmental rights
◦ natural law
◦ strict liability rights
◦ riparian rights

Question 2

The private right to sue for private nuisance was reinforced with the Supreme Court of Canada decision in St. Lawrence Cement Inc. v. Barrette in Quebec. Which of the following is incorrect related to this case?
◦ This action went forward as a class action, allowing the burden of bringing action to be spread much more widely.
◦ St. Lawrence Cement Inc. was found liable.
◦ As a result of this case, private nuisance is a much more effective tool.
◦ The court gave a broader definition to neighbour, giving all of the people affected the right of action.
◦ The common law doctrine of nuisance would have led to a different decision.

thall411 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 7, 2021

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 29% of students answer this correctly