Question 1
People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?
◦ real property rights
◦ environmental rights
◦ natural law
◦ strict liability rights
◦ riparian rights
Question 2
The private right to sue for private nuisance was reinforced with the Supreme Court of Canada decision in
St. Lawrence Cement Inc. v. Barrette in Quebec. Which of the following is incorrect related to this case?
◦ This action went forward as a class action, allowing the burden of bringing action to be spread much more widely.
◦ St. Lawrence Cement Inc. was found liable.
◦ As a result of this case, private nuisance is a much more effective tool.
◦ The court gave a broader definition to
neighbour, giving all of the people affected the right of action.
◦ The common law doctrine of nuisance would have led to a different decision.
Temperate deciduous forest in southeastern Canada
Tuktut Nogait National Park, Northwest Territories, Canada
This Russian godfather is leaving a Moscow court just after he was acquitted of a double murder. Do ...
Canada’s Arctic is changing dramatically
Suicide by Age and Sex, Canada, 2017