Jack recently had a job interview that seemed to go exceedingly well by all objective standards. However, Jack noted that his interviewer seemed to be in a bad mood that day.
To what extent should Jack be concerned about the latter piece of information? a) He should be aware that he will likely be viewed less favorably by the interviewer than if the interviewer was in a good mood.
b) He should be very concerned about the interviewer's bad mood unless something happened immediately after the interview to improve the interviewer's mood.
c) He should assume there is virtually no chance he will be offered the position due to the interviewer's negative mood.
d) He should not be concerned at all because the interviewer's mood should have no bearing on how he or she evaluates Jack.
Question 2
Suppose John has completed a study where he engaged in stereotype negation training. Given this scenario, John will likely ________.
a) be extremely confused by the procedure and, consequently, offer neutral responses
b) feel guilty about the fact that he associated certain racial stereotypes with the racial group toward which the stereotypes are typically targeted
c) continue to associate the racial stereotype with the member of the race in question
d) be much less inclined to associate the racial stereotype with the picture of the member of the matching race
Male coho salmon exhibit two alternative life history strategies. “Jackâ€ÂÂ
Skin signs are objective evidence of an illness or disorder. They can be seen, measured, or felt.
Jack-in-the-Pulpit
Examples of objective evaluation
Adult, Child, and Infant CPR Standards Cont
AACN Standards for Healthy Work Environments