This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following is a disadvantage of field experiments relative to laboratory experiments? ... (Read 135 times)

Cooldude101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Which of the following is a disadvantage of field experiments relative to laboratory experiments?
 
  A) There is less control over extraneous factors.
  B) They do not allow cause-effect conclusions.
  C) They are in unnatural settings.
  D) There is no ability to manipulate the independent variable.

Question 2

A social psychologist who combines a correlational study, a laboratory experiment, and a field experiment to test the same hypothesis so that she can be sure of her conclusions is
 
  A) using too many different methods.
  B) wasting her time.
  C) taking a full cycle approach.
  D) confounding her results.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

trampas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
Answer to Question 1

Answer: A

Answer to Question 2

Answer: C




Cooldude101

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Jun 22, 2018
:D TYSM


Perkypinki

  • Member
  • Posts: 339
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Congestive heart failure is a serious disorder that carries a reduced life expectancy. Heart failure is usually a chronic illness, and it may worsen with infection or other physical stressors.

Did you know?

The oldest recorded age was 122. Madame Jeanne Calment was born in France in 1875 and died in 1997. She was a vegetarian and loved olive oil, port wine, and chocolate.

Did you know?

Approximately 15–25% of recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, many miscarriages often occur before a woman even knows she is pregnant.

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library