Author Question: The 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence et al. v. Texas, declared that a Texas statute violated ... (Read 236 times)

cagreen833 · **on:** Jun 18, 2018

The 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence et al. v. Texas, declared that a Texas statute violated the U.S. Constitution. The Texas statute had made it a crime for

a. women to refuse sex to their husbands.
b. a person 21 years or older to marry a person 17 years or younger.
c. two persons of different races to marry.
d. two persons of the same sex to engage in an intimate sexual relationship.

Question 2

Patricia Voydanoff (cited by Aulette) asserts that there are several mediating factors in responding to a layoff that can make the difference in a family's ability to cope. A family is better able to cope when

a. the layoff is sudden without warning or anticipation.
b. they blame external or social structure factors and not the worker.
c. they perceive and accept the worker as a failure.
d. they know others in the same situation.

blakcmamba · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 18, 2018

Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

b

cagreen833 · **Reply #2 on:** Jun 18, 2018

Thank you!

blakcmamba · **Reply #3 on:** Jun 18, 2018

Happy to help

Author Question: The 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence et al. v. Texas, declared that a Texas statute violated ... (Read 236 times)

cagreen833

The 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence et al. v. Texas, declared that a Texas statute violated ...

Related Topics

Need homework help now?

blakcmamba

The 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence et al. v. Texas, declared that a Texas statute violated ...

cagreen833

The 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence et al. v. Texas, declared that a Texas statute violated ...

blakcmamba

The 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence et al. v. Texas, declared that a Texas statute violated ...