This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why is it difficult to evaluate the long-term benefits of the Head Start program in a scientific ... (Read 123 times)

Medesa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 507
Why is it difficult to evaluate the long-term benefits of the Head Start program in a scientific way?
 
  a. because it is not representative of the entire American population
  b. because it is funded at public expense
  c. because it is difficult to keep track of the children who were involved with it
  d. because it was not set up as an experiment

Question 2

The Abecedarian Program was more successful than other preschool compensatory programs in fostering long-term success most likely because of all of the following except
 
  a. it began at age 2 and continued through age 5.
  b. children attended all year long, not just during the school year.
  c. it had a low student-to-teacher ratio that allowed the staff to individualize instruction.
  d. about half the participants received school-age intervention from kindergarten through grade 3.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

okolip

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

A





 

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

Common abbreviations that cause medication errors include U (unit), mg (milligram), QD (every day), SC (subcutaneous), TIW (three times per week), D/C (discharge or discontinue), HS (at bedtime or "hours of sleep"), cc (cubic centimeters), and AU (each ear).

Did you know?

In 2012, nearly 24 milliion Americans, aged 12 and older, had abused an illicit drug, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library