Author Question: Preschoolers do better at referential communication in natural settings than in laboratory settings ... (Read 133 times)

urbanoutfitters

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Preschoolers do better at referential communication in natural settings than in laboratory settings because the natural settings
 
  a. have objects or animals that can do recasts.
  b. discourage the inference of illocutionary intent.
  c. have wind/rain/snow to provide sensory stimulation.
  d. are rich sources for contextual cues.

Question 2

____ is a codominant recessive trait for which, in heterozygous persons, the recessive trait is partially expressed in the phenotype, causing a person's red blood cells to assume an unusual crescent shape.
 
  a. Cystic fibrosis
  b. Albinism
  c. Tay-Sachs disease
  d. Sickle-cell anemia



shewald78

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

Limit intake of red meat and dairy products made with whole milk. Choose skim milk, low-fat or fat-free dairy products. Limit fried food. Use healthy oils when cooking.

Did you know?

There used to be a metric calendar, as well as metric clocks. The metric calendar, or "French Republican Calendar" divided the year into 12 months, but each month was divided into three 10-day weeks. Each day had 10 decimal hours. Each hour had 100 decimal minutes. Due to lack of popularity, the metric clocks and calendars were ended in 1795, three years after they had been first marketed.

Did you know?

If you use artificial sweeteners, such as cyclamates, your eyes may be more sensitive to light. Other factors that will make your eyes more sensitive to light include use of antibiotics, oral contraceptives, hypertension medications, diuretics, and antidiabetic medications.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library