Author Question: In U.S. v. Trenton Potteries, the Supreme Court held that the defendants' price-fixing agreements ... (Read 60 times)

Zulu123 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

In U.S. v. Trenton Potteries, the Supreme Court held that the defendants' price-fixing agreements were legal under a rule of reason analysis because they resulted in lower prices for consumers.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In contrast to legislative rules, interpretative rules are:
a. exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the APA
b. not exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the APA
c. exempt from the rule of law
d. not exempt from the rule of law
e. exempt from the commerce clause