Intentional and wrongful interference with another person's briefcase may be the tort of trespass to personal property.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Question 2
In Slater Numismatics v. Driving Force, Driving Force was set up by former employees of a firm Slater worked closely with. Driving Force then move to capture business from a major client of Slater. Slater sued for interference with contractual relations. The appeals court held that Slater:
a. failed to show improper interference with a contract, only possible interference with prospective customers
b. could sue for intentional interference because Driving Force was shown to have profit motives for attempting to take away business
c. had been defrauded by Driving Force
d. could not sue Driving Force because it was a matter of hard but honest competition
e. none of the other choices are correct
Older adults may grieve intensely over the loss of a person or situation that has been a part of the
In the summer of 1793, a yellow fever epidemic struck Philadelphia, killing nearly 4,000. Tens of th
In this cartoon, Boss Tweed welcomes cholera—a skeletal figure of death carrying a handbag from “Asi
A well-folded letter fits easily into the envelope and is easily removed by the person who receives ...
Retroactive and Proactive Interference
(left) Urine sample from an unaffected person does not change color upon exposure to air. (right) Ur