California and other states use the substantial factor test ...

[bobypop]

California and other states use the substantial factor test instead of the proximate cause rule.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman who was shopping was seriously injured by a robber in the parking lot. She sued the store claiming that its failure to provide adequate security was a breach of its duty to her. The Nebraska high court held that the store could:
 a. be sued for negligence
  b. be sued for strict liability for failure to protect a patron
  c. have been liable if the incident occurred in the store, but not out in the parking lot d. not be liable as the incident was a random, uncommon event
  e. none of the other choices

[akemokai]

Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

a

[bobypop]

Gracias!

[flexer1n1]

TYSM