Author Question: California and other states use the substantial factor test instead of the proximate cause rule. a. ... (Read 64 times)

bobypop · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

California and other states use the substantial factor test instead of the proximate cause rule.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman who was shopping was seriously injured by a robber in the parking lot. She sued the store claiming that its failure to provide adequate security was a breach of its duty to her. The Nebraska high court held that the store could:
a. be sued for negligence
b. be sued for strict liability for failure to protect a patron
c. have been liable if the incident occurred in the store, but not out in the parking lot d. not be liable as the incident was a random, uncommon event
e. none of the other choices