This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Frensenius Medical Care Holdings v. Tucker, the appeals court held it violated equal protection ... (Read 67 times)

dakota nelson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 604
In Frensenius Medical Care Holdings v. Tucker, the appeals court held it violated equal protection to restrict physician ownership of certain medical facilities because no rational bsis was shown for the rule.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Under the NLRB, unfair labor practice strikes are:
 A) personal activity.
 B) protected activity.
 C) criminal act.
 D) not acceptable.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ladyjames123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

B




dakota nelson

  • Member
  • Posts: 604
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Excellent


zacnyjessica

  • Member
  • Posts: 345
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."

Did you know?

Persons who overdose with cardiac glycosides have a better chance of overall survival if they can survive the first 24 hours after the overdose.

Did you know?

In 2012, nearly 24 milliion Americans, aged 12 and older, had abused an illicit drug, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library