Author Question: In the Shrimp Importation Case, the WTO Appellate Body determined that: A) the U.S. program ... (Read 92 times)

dakota nelson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 604
In the Shrimp Importation Case, the WTO Appellate Body determined that:
 A) the U.S. program certifying the use of TEDs or devices of comparable effectiveness was an unjustified discrimination against Malaysian shrimp products.
 B) the U.S. program certifying the use of TEDs or devices of comparable effectiveness was not an unjustified discrimination against Malaysian shrimp products.
 C) the U.S. program was invalid because it treated Malaysian shrimp differently than shrimp from other countries.
 D) the U.S. program was valid as it related to conservation of an exhaustible natural resource.

Question 2

Mortgages, security interests, and surety relationships are legal mechanisms created primarily to promote stability and flexibility in trade.
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



cegalasso

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

FALSE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

Human neurons are so small that they require a microscope in order to be seen. However, some neurons can be up to 3 feet long, such as those that extend from the spinal cord to the toes.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

Most childhood vaccines are 90–99% effective in preventing disease. Side effects are rarely serious.

Did you know?

In 1844, Charles Goodyear obtained the first patent for a rubber condom.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library